Public consultation on GMOs? Council vote will be test for local democracy

Press Release – GE Free NZ
The Auckland Council is facing the ultimate test for local democracy as a ‘supercity’ when the Plans Committee meet on Tuesday to consider the draft Unitary Plan. The issue is whether to allow the public to be consulted on wording on genetically modified organisms as proposed by a new report, or to sweep the report under the carpet.

The Final Section 32 analysis on GMOs is the culmination of many years of work by a team from legacy councils in Auckland and the North which jointly commissioned the Inter Council Working Party (ICWP) to consider local risks of GMOs.(1)

There are concerns that some Auckland Councillors are refusing to read the report or to respect its recommendations, because they may have been prejudiced by misinformation in presentations given by industry lobbyists.(2)

There is also concern amongst Local Boards who have been advocating to the council for precaution on GMOs, that their voices may be lost in the bureaucratic process or their concerns simply ignored.

“Representatives from across the political spectrum must heed the recommendations of the Section 32 report. The public need those Councillors who oppose a precautionary policy on GMOs in the draft Unitary Plan to set aside their prejudices,” said Jon Carapiet, spokesman for GE-free NZ in food and environment.

Independent scientists recently wrote to all Auckland Councillors strongly advising precaution on GMOs and for councillors to resist being misled by organisations with a vested interest in pubic subsidy of commercial risks.(3)

A survey of residents by the council shows that two out of three Aucklanders support local government action to prohibit GMO release or at minimum want users of GMOs held liable for damage. (4)

Local boards have made significant efforts to engage in advocacy for their communities as the dual-governship model for Auckland was designed to allow. How this functions in reality will be evidenced by the degree to which community support for precaution on GMOs is respected in Tuesday’s vote.

“This process is the ultimate vitality-test to see how well democracy has survived the disestablishment of legacy councils and the creation of a super city,” said Jon Carapiet.

“Aucklanders will not accept an issue of such significance being swept under the carpet.”

There has been a decade of community participation in development of plans for the Regional Policy Statement by the Auckland Regional Council, Waitakere eco-city’s GE-free zone, and the establishment of local GE-free Zones.

Last December Albert-Eden Local Board passed a motion for a GE-free Zone in continuation of the declaration made in 1999 by local communities including Waitakere, Western Bays, Waiheke, and Devonport. A motion for a GE-free zone will go before the Waitemata Local Board on Tuesday evening, just hours after the Plans Committee vote on including GMOs in the draft Unitary Plan.

The outcome of the Plans Committee vote will reveal to what degree local democracy has survived council amalgamation, or given way to central government authority and influence by vested interests. 

Content Sourced from
Original url



  1. John, 11. February 2013, 14:05

    Mr Carapiet is hallucinating if he thinks that vast numbers of Aucklanders have any interest in GMOs. If they know what GMO stands for they certainly don’t experience any impact. To the majority it is simply a non-issue.

  2. Mitchell, 11. February 2013, 22:01

    Witness the last throes of the GMO scaremongers! As for the RMA s32 analysis? It is amateurish at best. The final paragraph of the press release captures its hypocrisy: “democracy [being] influenced by vested interests”. Keep your children away from vacines GE Free NZ, they will grow a fifth limb.

  3. Jum, 3. March 2013, 12:44

    People are genuinely concerned about effects on our world that have been engineered by man. I would be too.

    On the other hand, with the dumbing down of the 99% of New Zealanders who believe John Key gives a damn about their quality of life, man could probably do with some vastly more intelligent genetic input from the animal kingdom, or the plant kingdom or the sea life they originally came from.